IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/indinn/v32y2025i4p500-511.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A debate: does Lean Startup represent a giant leap?

Author

Listed:
  • Christopher L. Tucci
  • Yuliya Snihur
  • Elena Novelli
  • Teppo Felin

Abstract

The Lean Startup approach, introduced by Eric Ries in 2011, has become a widely recognised method in entrepreneurship, emphasising rapid experimentation, customer feedback, and iterative development over traditional business planning. Building on a debate from the DRUID 2023 conference, this article presents scholarly reflections on whether the Lean Startup represents a ‘giant leap’ in our understanding of entrepreneurship, offering arguments both for and against this claim. The discussion highlights both the strengths and limitations of the Lean Startup approach, ultimately emphasising the need for a nuanced perspective on the conditions under which tools such as the Lean Startup are most effective to foster entrepreneurship and business model innovation.

Suggested Citation

  • Christopher L. Tucci & Yuliya Snihur & Elena Novelli & Teppo Felin, 2025. "A debate: does Lean Startup represent a giant leap?," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(4), pages 500-511, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:indinn:v:32:y:2025:i:4:p:500-511
    DOI: 10.1080/13662716.2025.2476431
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13662716.2025.2476431
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13662716.2025.2476431?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:indinn:v:32:y:2025:i:4:p:500-511. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CIAI20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.