IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Distribution Channel Decentralization and Strategic Durability Choice

Listed author(s):
  • Gregory Goering
Registered author(s):

    In a simple two-period setting we examine a decentralized distribution (marketing) channel consisting of an up-stream durable-goods manufacturer and down-stream retailer. The manufacturer sets the wholesale price and the product's durability while the retailer selects an output level. We show that in this setting, the profit-maximizing manufacturer unambiguously selects a higher durability than the socially efficient (cost-minimizing) level in both uncommitted sales and rental markets. We show this 'reversed planned obsolescence' result is due to the strategic benefit of durability in this double-marginalization (double monopoly mark-up) setting. This is in stark contrast to the usual integrated channel result where the profit-maximizing manufacturer will select an efficient level of durability in rental markets and an inefficiently low durability in uncommitted sales markets (due to the selling firm's commitment problem with potential buyers). Intuitively, with a decentralized distribution channel, the manufacturer faces potential commitment problems with both current buyers and its down-stream retailer. We show, only in cases where both sources of commitment issues are removed (i.e. the manufacturer can credibly commit to both potential buyers and its retailer), will the profit-maximizing durability choice be socially efficient.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Taylor & Francis Journals in its journal International Journal of the Economics of Business.

    Volume (Year): 17 (2010)
    Issue (Month): 2 ()
    Pages: 167-186

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:taf:ijecbs:v:17:y:2010:i:2:p:167-186
    DOI: 10.1080/13571516.2010.483086
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    Order Information: Web:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ijecbs:v:17:y:2010:i:2:p:167-186. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Michael McNulty)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.