IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/houspd/v36y2026i2p276-292.html

Economic Mobility or Safety Net? Examining Employment Status and Wage Trajectories of Housing Choice Voucher Recipients

Author

Listed:
  • Ruoniu Wang
  • Alex Ramiller
  • Arthur Acolin
  • Rebecca J. Walter

Abstract

This study examines employment status and wage trajectories of recipients of the Housing Choice Voucher (HCV) program from 2005 to 2018. Drawing on a national dataset containing 22.5 million householder-year observations, the research underscores the dual role of the HCV program as both a safety net for housing stability and a potential tool for economic mobility. The findings reveal that nearly three out of four voucher householders in the sample were not employed in any given year after entering the program. Additionally, over half of the householders (53.8%) never earned wage income during their participation in the HCV program. While a subset of voucher recipients who consistently earned wages experienced wage growth – contrasting with national trends of wage decline among similar income groups during the same period – the average absolute wage remains modest. Furthermore, the study highlights that the HCV program’s impact on economic mobility is uneven and varies significantly across demographic subgroups. These findings underscore the importance of recognizing the HCV program as first and foremost a policy that guarantees stable housing serving many individuals in need of permanent housing support who do not participate in the labor force. Policies aimed at HCV program exit should be targeted to the smaller group of voucher recipients who are able to participate in the workforce and focus on supporting these households’ employment goals.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruoniu Wang & Alex Ramiller & Arthur Acolin & Rebecca J. Walter, 2026. "Economic Mobility or Safety Net? Examining Employment Status and Wage Trajectories of Housing Choice Voucher Recipients," Housing Policy Debate, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(2), pages 276-292, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:houspd:v:36:y:2026:i:2:p:276-292
    DOI: 10.1080/10511482.2025.2591667
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10511482.2025.2591667
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10511482.2025.2591667?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:houspd:v:36:y:2026:i:2:p:276-292. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RHPD20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.