IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/houspd/v36y2026i2p201-225.html

Rent and Eviction Filing at Enterprise-Backed Rental Properties

Author

Listed:
  • Nick Graetz
  • Adam Chapnik
  • Jacob Udell
  • Ruthy Gourevitch

Abstract

In the study of government assistance and housing insecurity, one form of intervention is often overlooked: the mortgage financing of multifamily rental properties via Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (“the Enterprises”). Enterprise-backed financing has increased rapidly since 2000 and now accounts for roughly half of all outstanding multifamily mortgage debt. In this study, we linked Enterprise-backed properties to eviction filings and rent listings. Filing rates at Enterprise-backed properties exhibit the same concentrated distribution as has been found in the general rental market; the average filing rate among the top quartile of Enterprise-backed properties was 19.8 per 100 units in 2023. In adjusted models comparing to non-Enterprise properties, Enterprise-backed properties are located in neighborhoods that are Whiter, higher income, lower poverty, and with a lower proportion renting; Enterprise-backed properties also have filing rates that are 5% (1, 9; p

Suggested Citation

  • Nick Graetz & Adam Chapnik & Jacob Udell & Ruthy Gourevitch, 2026. "Rent and Eviction Filing at Enterprise-Backed Rental Properties," Housing Policy Debate, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(2), pages 201-225, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:houspd:v:36:y:2026:i:2:p:201-225
    DOI: 10.1080/10511482.2025.2581673
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10511482.2025.2581673
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10511482.2025.2581673?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:houspd:v:36:y:2026:i:2:p:201-225. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RHPD20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.