IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/houspd/v35y2025i4p686-711.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Displacement Into New York City’s Shelter System: Exploring the Roles of Neighborhood-Level Housing Dynamics

Author

Listed:
  • Valerie E. Stahl
  • Adèle Cassola
  • Madison Swayne

Abstract

This study examines the associations between neighborhood-level housing dynamics and displacement rates into the homeless shelter system in New York City (NYC). We analyze a novel dataset obtained from NYC’s Department of Homeless Services that tracks the neighborhood of origin for shelter entrants. Using descriptive methods, mapping, and ordinary least squares (OLS) regression, we examine the relationships between community characteristics and rates of shelter entry, shedding light on an under-studied level of analysis in homelessness research—neighborhoods. This article proposes two potential mechanisms that could contribute to shelter entry at the neighborhood level beyond the aggregation of individual risk: an increased risk of displacement and limited housing choices for displaced households. We find that neighborhood-level eviction rates, poverty rates, and proportions of African American/Black residents are positively associated with rates of displacement into the shelter system, with evictions being the strongest predictor of shelter entry. The study provides the first comprehensive examination of neighborhood-level correlates of shelter entry in NYC in nearly 30 years and fills a gap in the very small empirical literature examining the relationship between housing insecurity indicators and homelessness at the neighborhood level. Findings support policy recommendations that address homelessness at the neighborhood level and curb eviction and displacement to reduce instances of shelter entry.

Suggested Citation

  • Valerie E. Stahl & Adèle Cassola & Madison Swayne, 2025. "Displacement Into New York City’s Shelter System: Exploring the Roles of Neighborhood-Level Housing Dynamics," Housing Policy Debate, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(4), pages 686-711, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:houspd:v:35:y:2025:i:4:p:686-711
    DOI: 10.1080/10511482.2024.2426453
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10511482.2024.2426453
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10511482.2024.2426453?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:houspd:v:35:y:2025:i:4:p:686-711. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RHPD20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.