IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/houspd/v35y2025i2p137-160.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Missing Housing: How Los Angeles Is Wasting Multifamily Housing Units in the Midst of a Housing Crisis

Author

Listed:
  • Lex Frazier
  • W. Bowman Cutter

Abstract

Like other US cities, Los Angeles faces a housing crisis, with sale and rental prices exceeding the national average. We used data on property characteristics and zoning status to examine properties zoned for multifamily use in the city of Los Angeles, particularly those not building to their legally permitted maximum number of units, to determine whether those properties were capable of reaching this level of development. Our study reveals a 400,000-unit unbuilt allowable housing gap, predominantly in properties over 50 years old. We analyzed the properties as-built and developed scenarios under which they were built to their legal maximums, and found evidence that regulatory limits, mainly minimum parking requirements (MPRs), inhibit full development of these properties. However, there are also a large number of additional allowable units in buildings that do not face regulatory constraints. Our analysis of the upzoning Transit-Oriented Communities policy reveals that while zoning changes allow for more multifamily developments, many eligible properties still face regulatory hurdles. Our research shows that a core strategy for improving the Los Angeles area housing shortages should be policies to facilitate older properties redeveloping or adding units.

Suggested Citation

  • Lex Frazier & W. Bowman Cutter, 2025. "Missing Housing: How Los Angeles Is Wasting Multifamily Housing Units in the Midst of a Housing Crisis," Housing Policy Debate, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(2), pages 137-160, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:houspd:v:35:y:2025:i:2:p:137-160
    DOI: 10.1080/10511482.2024.2321234
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10511482.2024.2321234
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10511482.2024.2321234?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:houspd:v:35:y:2025:i:2:p:137-160. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RHPD20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.