IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/houspd/v34y2024i1p3-24.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantifying Doubled-Up Homelessness: Presenting a New Measure Using U.S. Census Microdata

Author

Listed:
  • Molly K. Richard
  • Julie Dworkin
  • Katherine Grace Rule
  • Suniya Farooqui
  • Zachary Glendening
  • Sam Carlson

Abstract

Some definitions of homelessness include doubling up—living with others because of economic hardship or housing loss. Doubling up can have negative consequences that should be addressed, but the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s methods for enumerating homelessness exclude these arrangements, and Department of Education counts of doubling up include only school children. We provide a new method for measuring doubled-up homelessness in the total population using American Community Survey public use microdata. Using this method, we find that 3.7 million people in the U.S. population were doubled up in 2019 and show significant differences in doubling up by geography, race and ethnicity, marital status, educational attainment, school enrollment, and employment status, and compare these findings with research on sheltered and unsheltered homelessness. Notably, rates of Hispanic/Latinx doubled-up homelessness were high, in contrast to their rates of literal homelessness, and some rural areas with low rates of sheltered and unsheltered homelessness had high rates of doubling up. To aid in future research and policy, supplemental materials provide open-source tools for replicating the measure. Findings suggest that policies addressing homelessness and housing insecurity consider those experiencing doubled-up homelessness and that the current measure can assist in those efforts.

Suggested Citation

  • Molly K. Richard & Julie Dworkin & Katherine Grace Rule & Suniya Farooqui & Zachary Glendening & Sam Carlson, 2024. "Quantifying Doubled-Up Homelessness: Presenting a New Measure Using U.S. Census Microdata," Housing Policy Debate, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(1), pages 3-24, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:houspd:v:34:y:2024:i:1:p:3-24
    DOI: 10.1080/10511482.2021.1981976
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10511482.2021.1981976
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10511482.2021.1981976?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:houspd:v:34:y:2024:i:1:p:3-24. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RHPD20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.