IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/houspd/v32y2022i6p915-939.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Periodic Evaluations of Risk Assessments: Identifying Families for Homelessness Prevention Services

Author

Listed:
  • Erica Jade Mullen
  • Angela Ghesquiere
  • Kinsey Dinan
  • Molly Richard
  • Edith Kealey
  • Sara Zuiderveen
  • Marybeth Shinn

Abstract

The New York City Homebase program is one of only a few comprehensive U.S. homelessness prevention programs. To ensure that in-depth services are provided to families most at risk of homelessness, Homebase utilizes a structured assessment, the Risk Assessment Questionnaire (RAQ), developed using 2004–2008 data. We evaluated the RAQ’s performance in a more recent cohort of 48,450 families with children applying for Homebase services from 2013 to 2016, testing the predictive power of the current assessment, as well as the power of existing and potential new individual items, using Cox survival models to predict homeless shelter application. The RAQ threshold for in-depth services still effectively identifies shelter risk (13.7%, vs. 5.9% for those below the threshold), suggesting that services are being directed to the highest-risk families. Simulations of a modified RAQ reflecting regression results and program leadership input present assessment adjustments to consider to improve its efficiency and predictive power.

Suggested Citation

  • Erica Jade Mullen & Angela Ghesquiere & Kinsey Dinan & Molly Richard & Edith Kealey & Sara Zuiderveen & Marybeth Shinn, 2022. "Periodic Evaluations of Risk Assessments: Identifying Families for Homelessness Prevention Services," Housing Policy Debate, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(6), pages 915-939, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:houspd:v:32:y:2022:i:6:p:915-939
    DOI: 10.1080/10511482.2022.2077801
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10511482.2022.2077801
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10511482.2022.2077801?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:houspd:v:32:y:2022:i:6:p:915-939. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RHPD20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.