IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/houspd/v22y2011i2p153-174.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Lot size, zoning, and household preferences

Author

Listed:
  • Elizabeth Kopits
  • Virginia McConnell
  • Daniel Miles

Abstract

Urban density is a key feature of urban structure, and there is continuing interest in what determines density and how it might be influenced over time. Residential lot sizes are the underlying determinant of urban density, and lot sizes are determined by complex interactions of supply and demand forces. This article attempts to shed light on the extent to which lot size has been influenced by regulatory constraints, such as zoning rules or consumer preferences, drawing on data from the large metropolitan area surrounding Washington, DC. We find that new single-family development has been built on large lots, averaging in recent years between one half and one full acre, and that there is some evidence of convergence between inner and outer suburbs in lot sizes in new development over time. Our more detailed comparison of actual to allowable density using subdivision-level data reveals that developers only appear to be constrained by zoning rules in areas where regulations require that lots be larger than two acres. Finally, the hedonic analysis confirms that household preferences for larger lots are strong, but the value of additional acreage seems to be decreasing over time, in at least one inner suburban county.

Suggested Citation

  • Elizabeth Kopits & Virginia McConnell & Daniel Miles, 2011. "Lot size, zoning, and household preferences," Housing Policy Debate, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(2), pages 153-174, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:houspd:v:22:y:2011:i:2:p:153-174
    DOI: 10.1080/10511482.2011.648203
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10511482.2011.648203
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10511482.2011.648203?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Elizabeth C. Delmelle & Yuhong Zhou & Jean-Claude Thill, 2014. "Densification without Growth Management? Evidence from Local Land Development and Housing Trends in Charlotte, North Carolina, USA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(6), pages 1-16, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:houspd:v:22:y:2011:i:2:p:153-174. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RHPD20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.