IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/hbhfxx/v17y2016i3p293-308.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predatory-Prey Decision Making During Market Bubbles—Preliminary Evidence from a Neurobiological Study

Author

Listed:
  • Olivier Mesly
  • Stéphane Bouchard

Abstract

The present paper examines decision making during market bubbles. In the context of high market volatility, high speculation and inappropriate regulation (e.g., as such was the case in the years prior to the 2008 subprime crisis), market agents adopt either a predator or prey position. By way of a neurobiological study, it is shown that market-agent-turned preys benefit from moderate stress when it enhances their level of vigilance; however, past a certain stress threshold, their efforts at wealth maximization are considerably reduced. This may explain some of the cognitive causes of failures found by various authors in their description of the market bubble phenomenon. The paper emphasizes the importance of setting up proper regulations aimed at preventing the emergence of predatory behaviors (such as those that prevailed with the establishment of predatory mortgages during the year 2000 in the United States) and better educating average investors.

Suggested Citation

  • Olivier Mesly & Stéphane Bouchard, 2016. "Predatory-Prey Decision Making During Market Bubbles—Preliminary Evidence from a Neurobiological Study," Journal of Behavioral Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(3), pages 293-308, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:hbhfxx:v:17:y:2016:i:3:p:293-308
    DOI: 10.1080/15427560.2016.1203326
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/15427560.2016.1203326
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/15427560.2016.1203326?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:hbhfxx:v:17:y:2016:i:3:p:293-308. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/hbhf .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.