IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/gnstxx/v30y2018i3p662-679.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

F-distribution calibrated empirical likelihood ratio tests for multiple hypothesis testing

Author

Listed:
  • Lei Wang
  • Dan Yang

Abstract

Multiple hypothesis testing can be important tools when conclusions are drawn by simultaneous testing of a large number of hypotheses in bioinformatics, general medicine, pharmacology and epidemiology. In this paper, we consider three nonparametric empirical likelihood ratio tests (ELRTs) for multiple hypothesis testing problems. When the number of hypotheses is far larger than sample size, however, these ELRTs using asymptotic chi-square calibration generally have much higher false discovery rate (FDR) and can be quite anti-conservative. We find that the first order term of the empirical likelihood ratio statistic closely resembles Hotelling's $T^2$T2 statistic admitting limiting F distributions for small sample size. Motivated by this result, we propose the F-distribution calibrated ELRTs. Simulation results indicate that the proposed tests not only can control the FDR in the acceptable range, but also guarantee the test efficacy in terms of maximising the number of discoveries for small and moderate sample sizes. Two real data applications are also included for illustration.

Suggested Citation

  • Lei Wang & Dan Yang, 2018. "F-distribution calibrated empirical likelihood ratio tests for multiple hypothesis testing," Journal of Nonparametric Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(3), pages 662-679, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:gnstxx:v:30:y:2018:i:3:p:662-679
    DOI: 10.1080/10485252.2018.1461867
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10485252.2018.1461867
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10485252.2018.1461867?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:gnstxx:v:30:y:2018:i:3:p:662-679. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/GNST20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.