IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/glecrv/v45y2016i1p19-41.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Global Outsourcing and Wage Inequality in Middle-Income Countries: Evidence from South Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Hongshik Lee
  • Soonhyung Sim

Abstract

A substantial number of studies have suggested that global outsourcing can induce wage inequality. As Feenstra and Hanson [(1996a) Foreign investment, outsourcing, and relative wage, in: R. C. Feestra, G. M. Hanson, and D. A. Irwin (Eds.) Political Economy of Trade Policy: Essays in Honor of Jagdish Bhagwati (Cambridge: The MIT Press), pp. 89--127] argued, global outsourcing is comparable to skill-biased technological change in that global outsourcing is more likely to increase the wage of skilled workers rather than their unskilled counterparts. We examine the effects of outsourcing on wage of skilled and unskilled workers in Korea's manufacturing sector with a focus on the dissimilar effects of outsourcing to developed countries (DCs) and less developed countries (LDCs) on relative wage. The results of system and difference GMM estimation based on manufacturing data from 1992 to 2006 indicate that outsourcing to DCs and LDCs have opposite (and significant) effects on relative wage, that is, outsourcing to DCs (LDCs) decreases the wage of skilled (unskilled) workers.

Suggested Citation

  • Hongshik Lee & Soonhyung Sim, 2016. "Global Outsourcing and Wage Inequality in Middle-Income Countries: Evidence from South Korea," Global Economic Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(1), pages 19-41, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:glecrv:v:45:y:2016:i:1:p:19-41
    DOI: 10.1080/1226508X.2015.1081075
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1226508X.2015.1081075
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/1226508X.2015.1081075?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:glecrv:v:45:y:2016:i:1:p:19-41. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RGER20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.