IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/glecrv/v33y2004i4p51-73.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Democratic consolidation and electoral reform in Southeast Asia: Philippines, Thailand, and Indonesia

Author

Listed:
  • Dong-Yoon Lee
  • Sang Hwa Chung

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to review the relationship of electoral system and democracy in the Philippines, Thailand and Indonesia. The study looks at the transformation process of the electoral system in each country, and performs a comparative study on post-democratization electoral reforms using the concepts of competitiveness and fairness. It is found that electoral systems displayed low levels of competitiveness and fairness before democratization, but that their reforms have led to an increase in competitiveness and an improvement in fairness in all three countries. Also, while the post-democratization electoral reforms have facilitated the above-mentioned democratic virtues, there have been significant country differences in the details of their progress. The Philippines promoted the competitiveness of the electoral system by adopting a party list system and guest candidate system. Although Thailand and Indonesia showed competitiveness in their electoral systems, they prohibited the participation of non-partisan candidates in elections for the sake of stability of party politics. The differences are reflections of their particular political histories and contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Dong-Yoon Lee & Sang Hwa Chung, 2004. "Democratic consolidation and electoral reform in Southeast Asia: Philippines, Thailand, and Indonesia," Global Economic Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(4), pages 51-73.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:glecrv:v:33:y:2004:i:4:p:51-73
    DOI: 10.1080/12265080408449862
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/12265080408449862
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:glecrv:v:33:y:2004:i:4:p:51-73. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Chris Longhurst). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RGER20 .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.