Author
Listed:
- Siavash Kazemirad
- Mohammad Ali Yazdi
Abstract
The three mechanisms known to be responsible for the failure of uncemented femoral stems in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) are the stress shielding, excessive bone-implant interface stress, and excessive initial micromotion. Since implant designers usually have to sacrifice two mechanisms to improve the other one, the aim of this study was to assess which of them plays a more important role in the failure of uncemented stems. Two hip implant stems which are widely used in the primary THA and their mid-term clinical outcomes are available, were selected. Then, the amount of the three failure mechanisms created by each stem during the normal walking gait cycle was determined for a 70 kg female patient using the finite element method. The results indicated that the stem with better clinical outcome induced an average of 36.6% less stress shielding in the proximal regions of femur bone compared with the other stem. However, the maximum bone-implant interface stress and maximum initial micromotion were, respectively, 30 and 155% higher for the stem with better clinical outcomes. It was therefore concluded that the stress shielding has a more significant impact on the mid-term life of uncemented stems. However, care must be taken to ensure that the other two failure mechanisms do not exceed a certain threshold. It was also observed that the thinner and shorter stem created a smaller amount of stress shielding in the femur bone. The outcomes of this study can be used to design new hip implant stems that can potentially last longer.
Suggested Citation
Siavash Kazemirad & Mohammad Ali Yazdi, 2025.
"The assessment of implant shape-dependent failure mechanisms in primary total hip arthroplasty using finite element analysis,"
Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(6), pages 750-763, April.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:28:y:2025:i:6:p:750-763
DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2023.2301676
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:28:y:2025:i:6:p:750-763. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/gcmb .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.