IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/gcmbxx/v28y2025i14p2204-2211.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Biomechanical evaluation of porcine lens capsule with and without nucleus after capsulotomy – Finite element analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Yoke-Rung Wong
  • Geraint P. Williams
  • Benjamin L. George
  • Gary Hin-Fai Yam
  • Marcus Han-Nian Ang
  • Jodhbir S. Mehta
  • Shian-Chao Tay

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that the nucleus could offer structural support to the lens capsule. This study investigated the biomechanical performance of porcine lens with and without nucleus for 4 mm, 4.5 mm, 5 mm, 5.5 mm and 6 mm capsulotomy and its potential impact on the stretch ratio of capsular bag when the anterior capsulotomy edge was stretched. Our simulation results showed higher strain for the capsular bag with nucleus, which is crucial for the porcine lens to tolerate more stretch without failure. This simulation could support future study on the optimization of capsulotomy based on patient specific condition, that is, the geometry of lens.

Suggested Citation

  • Yoke-Rung Wong & Geraint P. Williams & Benjamin L. George & Gary Hin-Fai Yam & Marcus Han-Nian Ang & Jodhbir S. Mehta & Shian-Chao Tay, 2025. "Biomechanical evaluation of porcine lens capsule with and without nucleus after capsulotomy – Finite element analysis," Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(14), pages 2204-2211, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:28:y:2025:i:14:p:2204-2211
    DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2024.2364812
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10255842.2024.2364812
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10255842.2024.2364812?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:28:y:2025:i:14:p:2204-2211. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/gcmb .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.