Hemodynamic analysis of hybrid treatment for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm based on Newtonian and non-Newtonian models in a patient-specific model

The accuracy of the Newtonian model used in retrograde visceral revascularization (RVR) of hybrid surgery for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) hemodynamic simulation remains unclear. Noting that an appropriate blood viscosity model is a significant factor to capture hemodynamic changes in numerical studies. Therefore, both Newtonian and non-Newtonian blood viscosity models were adopted in this study to investigate the importance of hemodynamics when non-Newtonian blood property was accounted for in a patient-specific RVR simulation. The results revealed that disturbed flow and unfavorable WSS distribution can be observed in the anastomosis region under both blood viscosity models due to the retrograde flow pattern in the RVR model. However, although the non-Newtonian blood model has negligible effect on flow pattern and pressure drop, there were of significance quantitative and qualitative difference of local normalized helicity and wall shear stress distribution under pulsatile flow condition. In particular, the unfavorable WSS indicators distribution was better matched with a patient-specific follow-up report when non-Newtonian blood viscosity was accounted for. To conclude, the use of a Newtonian blood model is a reasonable approximation to obtain the general features of the flow field under steady flow condition. However, to study the hemodynamic parameters within retrograde flow under pulsatile flow condition, a non-Newtonian model may be more appropriate.