IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/gcmbxx/v25y2022i5p512-520.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk of proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) implant failure upon different lateral femoral wall thickness in intertrochanteric fracture: a finite element analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Liqin Zheng
  • Duo Wai-Chi Wong
  • Xinmin Chen
  • Yuanzhuang Chen
  • Pengfei Li

Abstract

Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA) has been commonly used to treat intertrochanteric fractures, despite the risk of implant failure. The integrity of the femur could influence the risk of implant failure. This study evaluated the influence of lateral femoral wall thickness on the potential of implant failure. A finite element model of the hip was reconstructed from the Computed Tomography of a female patient. Five intertrochanteric fracture models at different lateral femoral wall thickness (T1 = 27.6 mm, T2 = 25.4 mm, T3 = 23.4 mm, T4 = 21.4 mm, and T5 = 19.3 mm) were then created and fixed with PFNA. We simulated a critical loading condition by a high loading case during walking. Elastoplastic material models with yield stress and failure strain were applied to the bone and implant in which breakage can be simulated using the element deletion function. In addition, the stress and displacement of the implant and femur were analysed. Implant breakage occurred at the sides of the proximal nail canal in cases of T4 and T5 which was further supported by the higher maximum von Mises stress and nail displacement. The increased stress and displacement of the implant may implicate a reduction of stability and risk of implant failure. We suggested that precaution shall be taken when the wall thickness was less than 21.4 mm.

Suggested Citation

  • Liqin Zheng & Duo Wai-Chi Wong & Xinmin Chen & Yuanzhuang Chen & Pengfei Li, 2022. "Risk of proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) implant failure upon different lateral femoral wall thickness in intertrochanteric fracture: a finite element analysis," Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(5), pages 512-520, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:25:y:2022:i:5:p:512-520
    DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2021.1964488
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10255842.2021.1964488
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10255842.2021.1964488?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:25:y:2022:i:5:p:512-520. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/gcmb .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.