IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/gcmbxx/v25y2022i4p464-474.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bone density optimized pedicle screw instrumentation improves screw pull-out force in lumbar vertebrae

Author

Listed:
  • Sebastiano Caprara
  • Marie-Rosa Fasser
  • José Miguel Spirig
  • Jonas Widmer
  • Jess G. Snedeker
  • Mazda Farshad
  • Marco Senteler

Abstract

Pedicle screw instrumentation is performed in the surgical treatment of a wide variety of spinal pathologies. A common postoperative complication associated with this procedure is screw loosening. It has been shown that patient-specific screw fixation can be automated to match standard clinical practice and that failure can be estimated preoperatively using computed tomography images. Hence, we set out to optimize three-dimensional preoperative planning to achieve more mechanically robust screw purchase allowing deviation from intuitive, standard screw parameters. Toward this purpose, we employed a genetic algorithm optimization to find optimal screw sizes and trajectories by maximizing the CT derived bone mechanical properties. The method was tested on cadaveric lumbar vertebrae (L1 to L5) of four human spines (2 female/2 male; age range 60–78 years). The main boundary conditions were the predefined, level-dependent areas of possible screw entry points, as well as the automatically located pedicle structures. Finite element analysis was used to compare the genetic algorithm output to standard clinical planning of screw positioning in terms of the simulated pull-out strength. The genetic algorithm optimization successfully found screw sizes and trajectories that maximize the sum of the Young’s modulus within the screw’s volume for all 40 pedicle screws included in this study. Overall, there was a 26% increase in simulated pull-out strength for optimized compared to traditional screw trajectories and sizes. Our results indicate that optimizing pedicle screw instrumentation in lumbar vertebrae based on bone quality measures improves screw purchase as compared to traditional instrumentation.

Suggested Citation

  • Sebastiano Caprara & Marie-Rosa Fasser & José Miguel Spirig & Jonas Widmer & Jess G. Snedeker & Mazda Farshad & Marco Senteler, 2022. "Bone density optimized pedicle screw instrumentation improves screw pull-out force in lumbar vertebrae," Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(4), pages 464-474, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:25:y:2022:i:4:p:464-474
    DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2021.1959558
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10255842.2021.1959558
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10255842.2021.1959558?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:25:y:2022:i:4:p:464-474. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/gcmb .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.