IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/gcmbxx/v25y2022i3p342-357.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Damage analysis of human cortical bone under compressive and tensile loadings

Author

Listed:
  • Ebrahim Maghami
  • Jason P. Moore
  • Timothy O. Josephson
  • Ahmad R. Najafi

Abstract

Developing advanced fracture tools can increase the understanding of crack growth trajectories in human cortical bone. The present study investigates fracture micromechanics of human cortical bone under compressive and tensile loadings utilizing a phase field method. We construct two-dimensional finite element models from cortical microstructure of a human tibia cross section. We apply compression on the cortical bone models to create compressive microcracks. Then, we simulate the fracture of these models under tension to discover influential parameters on microcracks formation and post-yielding behavior. The results show that cement lines are susceptible sites to damage nucleation under compression rather than tension. The findings of this study also indicate a higher accumulation of initial damage (induced by compression) can lead to a lower microscopic stiffness as well as a less resistant material to damage initiation under tension. The simulations further indicate that the post-yielding properties (e.g., toughness) can be dependent on different variables such as morphological information of the osteons, the initial accumulation of microcracks, and the total length of cement lines.

Suggested Citation

  • Ebrahim Maghami & Jason P. Moore & Timothy O. Josephson & Ahmad R. Najafi, 2022. "Damage analysis of human cortical bone under compressive and tensile loadings," Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(3), pages 342-357, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:25:y:2022:i:3:p:342-357
    DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2021.2023135
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10255842.2021.2023135
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10255842.2021.2023135?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:25:y:2022:i:3:p:342-357. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/gcmb .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.