IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/gcmbxx/v25y2022i11p1222-1234.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Extraction of patient-specific boundary conditions from 4D-DSA and their influence on CFD simulations of cerebral aneurysms

Author

Listed:
  • Yuya Uchiyama
  • Soichiro Fujimura
  • Hiroyuki Takao
  • Hiroshi Ono
  • Keigo Katayama
  • Takashi Suzuki
  • Toshihiro Ishibashi
  • Katharina Otani
  • Kostadin Karagiozov
  • Koji Fukudome
  • Yuichi Murayama
  • Makoto Yamamoto

Abstract

We developed a new technique for extracting patient-specific inflow conditions, such as the pulse cycle duration and blood flow velocity, from four-dimensional digital subtraction angiography images and experimentally examined its validity. The maximum error between the values extracted by the technique and measured values was 14.3%. We performed blood flow simulations and calculated representative haemodynamic parameters. The maximum differences between the parameters obtained using general and patient-specific inflow conditions were approximately 400%, 150%, and 50% for the velocity, normalised wall shear stress, and pressure loss coefficient, respectively. These results indicate that patient-specific conditions are critical for accurately reproducing aneurysmal haemodynamics.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuya Uchiyama & Soichiro Fujimura & Hiroyuki Takao & Hiroshi Ono & Keigo Katayama & Takashi Suzuki & Toshihiro Ishibashi & Katharina Otani & Kostadin Karagiozov & Koji Fukudome & Yuichi Murayama & Mak, 2022. "Extraction of patient-specific boundary conditions from 4D-DSA and their influence on CFD simulations of cerebral aneurysms," Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(11), pages 1222-1234, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:25:y:2022:i:11:p:1222-1234
    DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2021.2005035
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10255842.2021.2005035
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10255842.2021.2005035?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:25:y:2022:i:11:p:1222-1234. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/gcmb .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.