IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/gcmbxx/v21y2018i2p169-176.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of cortical bone fracture resistance curves by fusing artificial neural networks and linear regression

Author

Listed:
  • Arso M. Vukicevic
  • Gordana R. Jovicic
  • Milos N. Jovicic
  • Vladimir L. Milicevic
  • Nenad D. Filipovic

Abstract

Bone injures (BI) represents one of the major health problems, together with cancer and cardiovascular diseases. Assessment of the risks associated with BI is nontrivial since fragility of human cortical bone is varying with age. Due to restrictions for performing experiments on humans, only a limited number of fracture resistance curves (R-curves) for particular ages have been reported in the literature. This study proposes a novel decision support system for the assessment of bone fracture resistance by fusing various artificial intelligence algorithms. The aim was to estimate the R-curve slope, toughness threshold and stress intensity factor using the two input parameters commonly available during a routine clinical examination: patients age and crack length. Using the data from the literature, the evolutionary assembled Artificial Neural Network was developed and used for the derivation of Linear regression (LR) models of R-curves for arbitrary age. Finally, by using the patient (age)-specific LR models and diagnosed crack size one could estimate the risk of bone fracture under given physiological conditions. Compared to the literature, we demonstrated improved performances for estimating nonlinear changes of R-curve slope (R2 = 0.82 vs. R2 = 0.76) and Toughness threshold with ageing (R2 = 0.73 vs. R2 = 0.66).

Suggested Citation

  • Arso M. Vukicevic & Gordana R. Jovicic & Milos N. Jovicic & Vladimir L. Milicevic & Nenad D. Filipovic, 2018. "Assessment of cortical bone fracture resistance curves by fusing artificial neural networks and linear regression," Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(2), pages 169-176, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:21:y:2018:i:2:p:169-176
    DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2018.1431220
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10255842.2018.1431220
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10255842.2018.1431220?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:21:y:2018:i:2:p:169-176. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/gcmb .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.