IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/gcmbxx/v20y2017i2p193-200.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Influence of bicortical techniques in internal connection placed in premaxillary area by 3D finite element analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Fellippo Ramos Verri
  • Ronaldo Silva Cruz
  • Cleidiel Aparecido Araújo Lemos
  • Victor Eduardo de Souza Batista
  • Daniel Augusto Faria Almeida
  • Ana Caroline Gonçales Verri
  • Eduardo Piza Pellizzer

Abstract

The aim of study was to evaluate the stress distribution in implant-supported prostheses and peri-implant bone using internal hexagon (IH) implants in the premaxillary area, varying surgical techniques (conventional, bicortical and bicortical in association with nasal floor elevation), and loading directions (0°, 30° and 60°) by three-dimensional (3D) finite element analysis. Three models were designed with Invesalius, Rhinoceros 3D and Solidworks software. Each model contained a bone block of the premaxillary area including an implant (IH, Ø4 × 10 mm) supporting a metal-ceramic crown. 178 N was applied in different inclinations (0°, 30°, 60°). The results were analyzed by von Mises, maximum principal stress, microstrain and displacement maps including ANOVA statistical test for some situations. Von Mises maps of implant, screws and abutment showed increase of stress concentration as increased loading inclination. Bicortical techniques showed reduction in implant apical area and in the head of fixation screws. Bicortical techniques showed slight increase stress in cortical bone in the maximum principal stress and microstrain maps under 60° loading. No differences in bone tissue regarding surgical techniques were observed. As conclusion, non-axial loads increased stress concentration in all maps. Bicortical techniques showed lower stress for implant and screw; however, there was slightly higher stress on cortical bone only under loads of higher inclinations (60°).

Suggested Citation

  • Fellippo Ramos Verri & Ronaldo Silva Cruz & Cleidiel Aparecido Araújo Lemos & Victor Eduardo de Souza Batista & Daniel Augusto Faria Almeida & Ana Caroline Gonçales Verri & Eduardo Piza Pellizzer, 2017. "Influence of bicortical techniques in internal connection placed in premaxillary area by 3D finite element analysis," Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(2), pages 193-200, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:20:y:2017:i:2:p:193-200
    DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2016.1209188
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10255842.2016.1209188
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10255842.2016.1209188?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fellippo Ramos Verri & Ronaldo Silva Cruz & Victor Eduardo de Souza Batista & Daniel Augusto de Faria Almeida & Ana Caroline Gonçales Verri & Cleidiel Aparecido de Araújo Lemos & Joel Ferreira Santiag, 2016. "Can the modeling for simplification of a dental implant surface affect the accuracy of 3D finite element analysis?," Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(15), pages 1665-1672, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Victor Eduardo de Souza Batista & Fellippo Ramos Verri & Daniel Augusto de Faria Almeida & Joel Ferreira Santiago Junior & Cleidiel Aparecido Araújo Lemos & Eduardo Piza Pellizzer, 2017. "Finite element analysis of implant-supported prosthesis with pontic and cantilever in the posterior maxilla," Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(6), pages 663-670, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:20:y:2017:i:2:p:193-200. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/gcmb .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.