IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/gcmbxx/v20y2017i13p1394-1402.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Influence of ground reaction force perturbations on anterior cruciate ligament loading during sidestep cutting

Author

Listed:
  • Joshua T. Weinhandl
  • Kristian M. O’Connor

Abstract

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury risk is likely increased under unexpected loading conditions. Such situations may arise from mid-air contact with another athlete, or misjudgments in landing height, stride length or surface compliance resulting in an unbalanced landing and unexpected changes in the ground reaction forces (GRFs). The purpose this study was to identify how GRF perturbations influence ACL loading during sidestep cutting. Muscle-actuated simulations of sidestep cutting were generated and analyzed for 20 subjects. Perturbations of 20, 40 and 60% of the nominal value were applied to the posterior, vertical, and medial GRF. Open-loop, forward dynamics simulations were run with no feedback or correction mechanism which allowed deviations from the experimentally measured kinematics as a result of the GRF perturbations. Posterior and vertical GRF perturbations significantly increased ACL loading, although the change was more pronounced with posterior perturbations. These changes were primarily due to the sagittal plane component of ACL loading regardless of perturbation direction. Peak ACL loading occurred almost immediately after initial ground contact, and was thus predicated on initial joint configuration. The results of this study give merit to including knee flexion angle at initial ground contact in the evolving neuromuscular training modalities aimed at preventing non-contact ACL injury.

Suggested Citation

  • Joshua T. Weinhandl & Kristian M. O’Connor, 2017. "Influence of ground reaction force perturbations on anterior cruciate ligament loading during sidestep cutting," Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(13), pages 1394-1402, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:20:y:2017:i:13:p:1394-1402
    DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2017.1366993
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10255842.2017.1366993
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10255842.2017.1366993?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:20:y:2017:i:13:p:1394-1402. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/gcmb .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.