IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/gcmbxx/v20y2017i12p1339-1349.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Biomechanical comparison of conventional and optimised locking plates for the fixation of intraarticular calcaneal fractures: a finite element analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Hanbin Ouyang
  • Yuping Deng
  • Pusheng Xie
  • Yang Yang
  • Bingyun Jiang
  • Canjun Zeng
  • Wenhua Huang

Abstract

Intraarticular calcaneal fractures can result in poor prognosis. Although operative fixation can improve the functional outcomes in most cases, surgical complications such as loss of reduction and wound healing problems may increase the risk of reoperation. Hence, this study aimed to design calcaneal locking plate with a lower profile and better biomechanical performance and to compare the redesigned plate with the traditional calcaneal plate via the finite element method. A Sanders’ type II-C intraarticular calcaneal fracture was simulated. Two fixation models utilising the branch-like calcaneal locking plate and the full plate were constructed. Topology optimisation was conducted to generate a new calcaneal plate design. A biomechanical comparison among the three groups of plates was performed using the finite element method. For the fracture simulated in this study, the optimised plate was superior to the traditional plate in terms of fixation stability and safety but was reduced in volume by approximately 12.34%. In addition, more rational stress distributions were observed in the redesigned plate, underscoring the superiority of this new design in terms of fatigue strength. These results demonstrate that the topology optimisation can be used to design a new implant with a minimised profile and no loss of fixation stability.

Suggested Citation

  • Hanbin Ouyang & Yuping Deng & Pusheng Xie & Yang Yang & Bingyun Jiang & Canjun Zeng & Wenhua Huang, 2017. "Biomechanical comparison of conventional and optimised locking plates for the fixation of intraarticular calcaneal fractures: a finite element analysis," Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(12), pages 1339-1349, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:20:y:2017:i:12:p:1339-1349
    DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2017.1361938
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10255842.2017.1361938
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10255842.2017.1361938?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:20:y:2017:i:12:p:1339-1349. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/gcmb .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.