IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/gcmbxx/v20y2017i12p1273-1288.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Validation performance comparison for finite element models of the human brain

Author

Listed:
  • Logan E. Miller
  • Jillian E. Urban
  • Joel D. Stitzel

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare the performance of six validated brain finite element (FE) models to localized brain motion validation data in five experimental configurations. Model performance was measured using the objective metric CORA (CORrelation and Analysis), where higher ratings represent better correlation. The KTH model achieved the highest average CORA rating, and the ABM received the highest average rating among models robustly validated against five cadaver impacts in three directions. This technique can be more frequently employed to build better models and, when associated limitations are well understood, to compare inter-model performance under similar conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Logan E. Miller & Jillian E. Urban & Joel D. Stitzel, 2017. "Validation performance comparison for finite element models of the human brain," Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(12), pages 1273-1288, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:20:y:2017:i:12:p:1273-1288
    DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2017.1340462
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10255842.2017.1340462
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10255842.2017.1340462?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:20:y:2017:i:12:p:1273-1288. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/gcmb .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.