IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/gcmbxx/v19y2016i13p1456-1461.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An approach to quantitative assessment of hemodynamic differences between unruptured and ruptured ophthalmic artery aneurysms

Author

Listed:
  • Hongyu Yu
  • Haiyun Li
  • Jian Liu
  • Xinjian Yang

Abstract

Background and purpose: Hemodynamic parameters are important in the pathogenesis, evolution and rupture of intracranial aneurysm. Energy loss (EL) has been applied for the rupture risk prediction of artery aneurysms recently. We proposed a new EL and further investigate its effects on the rupture of aneurysms. Materials and methods: Sixty-four patient-specific ophthalmic aneurysm datasets were divided into ruptured and unruptured groups based on their clinical history. Based on patient-specific 3D-DSA data, realistic models were retrospectively reconstructed and then analyzed by using computational fluid dynamic method. Results: The flow field feature EL in ruptured cases was significantly higher than that in unruptured cases. The average wall shear stress (WSS) and the maximum WSS in ruptured cases were higher than those in unruptured cases. Modified pressure loss coefficient (PLCM) in ruptured cases was slight higher than that in unruptured cases but the difference has no statistical significance. Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated flow field feature EL (p < 0.05) and the maximum WSS (p < 0.05) were the only independently significant variables to predict rupture of ophthalmic aneurysm. There were no differences in PLCM, the maximum oscillatory shear index (OSI), the average OSI and AR between the two groups. Conclusion: Flow field feature EL may be a reliable factor to predict the rupture risk of aneurysms.

Suggested Citation

  • Hongyu Yu & Haiyun Li & Jian Liu & Xinjian Yang, 2016. "An approach to quantitative assessment of hemodynamic differences between unruptured and ruptured ophthalmic artery aneurysms," Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(13), pages 1456-1461, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:19:y:2016:i:13:p:1456-1461
    DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2016.1151009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10255842.2016.1151009
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10255842.2016.1151009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:19:y:2016:i:13:p:1456-1461. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/gcmb .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.