IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/gcmbxx/v15y2012i7p745-751.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimation of accuracy of patient-specific musculoskeletal modelling: case study on a post polio residual paralysis subject

Author

Listed:
  • T. Dao
  • F. Marin
  • P. Pouletaut
  • F. Charleux
  • P. Aufaure
  • M. Ho Ba Tho

Abstract

For patients with patterns ranging out of anthropometric standard values, patient-specific musculoskeletal modelling becomes crucial for clinical diagnosis and follow-up. However, patient-specific modelling using imaging techniques and motion capture systems is mainly subject to experimental errors. The aim of this study was to quantify these experimental errors when performing a patient-specific musculoskeletal model. CT scan data were used to personalise the geometrical model and its inertial properties for a post polio residual paralysis subject. After having performed a gait-based experimental protocol, kinematics data were measured using a VICON motion capture system with six infrared cameras. The musculoskeletal model was computed using a direct/inverse algorithm (LifeMod software). A first source of errors was identified in the segmentation procedure in relation to the calculation of personalised inertial parameters. The second source of errors was subject related, as it depended on the reproducibility of performing the same type of gait. The impact of kinematics, kinetics and muscle forces resulting from the musculoskeletal modelling was quantified using relative errors and the absolute root mean square error. Concerning the segmentation procedure, we found that the kinematics results were not sensitive to the errors (relative error < 1%). However, a strong influence was noted on the kinetics results (deviation up to 71%). Furthermore, the reproducibility error showed a significant influence (relative mean error varying from 5 to 30%). The present paper demonstrates that in patient-specific musculoskeletal modelling variations due to experimental errors derived from imaging techniques and motion capture need to be both identified and quantified. Therefore, the paper can be used as a guideline.

Suggested Citation

  • T. Dao & F. Marin & P. Pouletaut & F. Charleux & P. Aufaure & M. Ho Ba Tho, 2012. "Estimation of accuracy of patient-specific musculoskeletal modelling: case study on a post polio residual paralysis subject," Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(7), pages 745-751.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:15:y:2012:i:7:p:745-751
    DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2011.558086
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10255842.2011.558086
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10255842.2011.558086?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ward Bartels & Jan Demol & Frederik Gelaude & Ilse Jonkers & Jos Vander Sloten, 2015. "Computed tomography-based joint locations affect calculation of joint moments during gait when compared to scaling approaches," Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(11), pages 1238-1251, August.
    2. Ang-Xiao Fan & Stéphanie Dakpé & Tien Tuan Dao & Philippe Pouletaut & Mohamed Rachik & Marie Christine Ho Ba Tho, 2017. "MRI-based finite element modeling of facial mimics: a case study on the paired zygomaticus major muscles," Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(9), pages 919-928, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:15:y:2012:i:7:p:745-751. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/gcmb .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.