IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/gcmbxx/v13y2010i3p319-326.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Topology optimisation of spinal interbody cage for reducing stress shielding effect

Author

Listed:
  • Hun Guan Chuah
  • Inzarulfaisham Abd Rahim
  • Mohd Imran Yusof

Abstract

The stress shielding effect is an event in which the replacement implant limits the load transferred to bone and the ineffective stress in the vertebrae causes bony growth to cease. In the present study, a 3D finite element L4–L5 model was developed and subjected to a 1200 N compression preload. Five groups of muscle forces were applied on L4 under flexion–extension, lateral bending and axial rotation. Topology optimisation was employed for reducing the stress shielding effect by removing the ineffective material from the design domain. The optimised design was designed with polyaryletheretherketone (PEEK) titanium and cortical materials to encounter the shielding response. The stress responses show that the new design increased the stress magnitude by at least 17.10, 18.11 and 18.43% in 4 Nm of flexion–extension, lateral bending and axial rotation, respectively. In conclusion, the material factor did not significantly alter the stress magnitude, but volume was the key factor in reducing the stress shielding effect.

Suggested Citation

  • Hun Guan Chuah & Inzarulfaisham Abd Rahim & Mohd Imran Yusof, 2010. "Topology optimisation of spinal interbody cage for reducing stress shielding effect," Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(3), pages 319-326.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:13:y:2010:i:3:p:319-326
    DOI: 10.1080/10255840903208189
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10255840903208189
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10255840903208189?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:13:y:2010:i:3:p:319-326. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/gcmb .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.