IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/gcmbxx/v12y2009i6p709-720.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Could passive knee laxity be related to active gait mechanics? An exploratory computational biomechanical study using probabilistic methods

Author

Listed:
  • Michael A. Strickland
  • Martin Browne
  • Mark Taylor

Abstract

Improving total knee replacement (TKR) requires better understanding of the many factors influencing clinical outcomes. Recently, probabilistic studies have investigated the influence of variability for individual TKR activities. This study demonstrates conceptually how probabilistic studies might further provide a framework to explore relationships not just within but between multiple different activities, e.g. intra-operative passive laxity drawer loading and post-operative active gait. Two implants were compared using simulated ISO-gait and passive laxity loading, with factors including mal-positioning and soft-tissue constraint varied using Monte-Carlo analysis. The results illustrate that correlations between different activities can be quantified; this demonstration study suggests further research is justified (with detailed clinically representative models) to explore the relationship between passive and active mechanics for specific in vivo conditions. Probabilistics is a key enabling methodology for achieving this goal. In future, exploring correlations between different activities may facilitate a better holistic understanding of TKR function.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael A. Strickland & Martin Browne & Mark Taylor, 2009. "Could passive knee laxity be related to active gait mechanics? An exploratory computational biomechanical study using probabilistic methods," Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(6), pages 709-720.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:12:y:2009:i:6:p:709-720
    DOI: 10.1080/10255840902895994
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10255840902895994
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10255840902895994?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:12:y:2009:i:6:p:709-720. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/gcmb .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.