IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/gcmbxx/v11y2008i3p257-262.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

3D Evaluation of the acetabular coverage assessed by biplanar X-rays or single anteroposterior X-ray compared with CT-scan

Author

Listed:
  • Ludovic Humbert
  • Henri Carlioz
  • Aurelien Baudoin
  • Wafa Skalli
  • David Mitton

Abstract

Considering the increasing development of three dimensional (3D) imaging, the 3D assessment of the acetabular coverage is to become the most interesting tool for the detection of acetabular pathologies. Biplanar X-rays based methods allow a 3D reconstruction of the hip with a reduced radiation dose. This study proposes a 3D assessment method of the acetabular coverage from biplanar X-rays or from an anteroposterior X-ray (conventional clinical imaging). An in vitro evaluation of the method was performed on six hip joints in comparison with computed tomography. The global coverage, the local coverage and the acetabular rim orientation were estimated in 3D. The mean global acetabular coverage was 40% with an estimated mean accuracy of 1.3% for the biplanar X-rays based method. This study evaluated a 3D assessment method of the acetabular coverage from biplanar X-rays or anteroposterior X-ray and open the way for clinical in vivo applications.

Suggested Citation

  • Ludovic Humbert & Henri Carlioz & Aurelien Baudoin & Wafa Skalli & David Mitton, 2008. "3D Evaluation of the acetabular coverage assessed by biplanar X-rays or single anteroposterior X-ray compared with CT-scan," Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(3), pages 257-262.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:11:y:2008:i:3:p:257-262
    DOI: 10.1080/10255840701760423
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10255840701760423
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10255840701760423?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:11:y:2008:i:3:p:257-262. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/gcmb .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.