IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ftpvxx/v37y2025i6p834-856.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using Deep Learning Neural Networks to Predict Violent vs. Nonviolent Extremist Behaviors

Author

Listed:
  • Kurt Braddock

Abstract

Recent analyses of radicalization processes have shown that extremist attitudes and violent behavior may be related in some cases, but are rarely collinear. It therefore benefits analysts of political violence to leverage tools that assist in the distinction of characteristics that might move an individual towards violence (vs. nonviolence) in support of their beliefs. To this end, the current study explores the efficacy of deep learning neural networks for classifying extremists as potentially violent or nonviolent based on dozens of common predictors derived from various perspectives on radicalization. Specifically, this study uses 337 predictors from the Profiles of Individual Radicalization in the U.S. dataset to populate a neural network with two hidden layers composed of four processing nodes. The model correctly predicted whether an individual engaged in violence (or not) in 94.2 percent of cases, on average. Analyses further identified several predictors that were most important in classifying violent and nonviolent cases. These analyses demonstrate neural networks may be effective tools in the study of radicalization and extremism, particularly regarding the disaggregation of salient outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Kurt Braddock, 2025. "Using Deep Learning Neural Networks to Predict Violent vs. Nonviolent Extremist Behaviors," Terrorism and Political Violence, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(6), pages 834-856, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:ftpvxx:v:37:y:2025:i:6:p:834-856
    DOI: 10.1080/09546553.2024.2376639
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09546553.2024.2376639
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09546553.2024.2376639?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ftpvxx:v:37:y:2025:i:6:p:834-856. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/ftpv20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.