IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/fswixx/v37y2026i1p29-62.html

Assessing Sandline International’s reputation as a private military company

Author

Listed:
  • Joseph Temple
  • Samantha Newbery

Abstract

Employed by states, Private Military Companies (PMCs) are paid to support, fight alongside, or fight instead of a state’s armed forces. The reputation of PMCs as a whole, and of an individual PMC, will influence to what extent they are used, what they are used for and which companies are given the most lucrative contracts. Using a definition of reputation from the scholarship on corporate reputation, this article assesses Sandline International, a British PMC active during the late 1990s and early 2000s. It uses Sandline’s two most controversial operations: those in Sierra Leone and Papua New Guinea. As the most well-known of the company’s contracts, using these provides enough data to allow the article to identify this company’s reputation amongst its customers and amongst scholarly observers. The article finds that a range of factors influence and explain Sandline’s reputation, including known links to other companies, the company’s own efforts at managing its reputation, and – not always within its own control – the extent to which its contracts and its work are kept secret. Continued analysis of corporate reputation of PMCs is worthwhile given there are many controversies surrounding PMCs’ existence and use yet it is highly likely that they will continue to be used.

Suggested Citation

  • Joseph Temple & Samantha Newbery, 2026. "Assessing Sandline International’s reputation as a private military company," Small Wars and Insurgencies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(1), pages 29-62, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:fswixx:v:37:y:2026:i:1:p:29-62
    DOI: 10.1080/09592318.2025.2572593
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09592318.2025.2572593
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09592318.2025.2572593?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:fswixx:v:37:y:2026:i:1:p:29-62. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/fswi .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.