IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/fswixx/v31y2020i2p219-240.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Accidental ethnographers: the Islamic State’s tribal engagement experiment

Author

Listed:
  • Craig Whiteside
  • Anas Elallame

Abstract

The disillusionment with U.S.-led counter insurgent efforts to gain a deeper understanding of social dynamics in countries with extensive tribal structures has led to a rejection of programs aimed to improve cultural competency. The Islamic State movement does not share this perception, and its strategists blamed its early failures during the U.S. occupation on a flawed understanding of tribal dynamics. This paper traces the political, ideological, and structural changes the leaders of the Islamic State movement made to adapt its approach toward the Sunni tribes of Iraq and later Syria, in order to develop a deeper base of popular support for its caliphate project. The group’s study of the tribes was done by a new tribal engagement office that put into motion an ethnographic study of tribal networks in key areas. There is evidence that the inspiration for this change came from its opponents. The Islamic State movement used these new insights to win a greater level of influence in rural areas, which in turn influenced its success in 2014. This research supports the idea that insurgency and counterinsurgency success often depend on which side is best at the incorporation of cultural and societal knowledge into policy and strategy.

Suggested Citation

  • Craig Whiteside & Anas Elallame, 2020. "Accidental ethnographers: the Islamic State’s tribal engagement experiment," Small Wars and Insurgencies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(2), pages 219-240, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:fswixx:v:31:y:2020:i:2:p:219-240
    DOI: 10.1080/09592318.2020.1713529
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09592318.2020.1713529
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09592318.2020.1713529?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:fswixx:v:31:y:2020:i:2:p:219-240. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/fswi .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.