IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/fosoec/v55y2026i1p83-104.html

For Whom Does One Toil? Time Use Differentials, Social Reproduction, and Occupational Prestige

Author

Listed:
  • David M. Fields
  • Jacqueline Strenio
  • Odile Mackett
  • Iris Buder

Abstract

Social reproduction theory builds upon Marxist theories that center on the extent to which labor power is the source of capital’s growth through the exploitation of the working class, providing a unique lens for analyzing how labor power differences may contribute to structural inequity. While research has shown that women and girls are primarily responsible for the majority of unpaid reproductive labor, little research has considered how time spent in unpaid work may also vary by social class position. We utilize nationally representative data from the American Time Use Survey to estimate time use differentials across occupational prestige deciles, separately by gender, to address this question. We find that higher occupational prestige is significantly associated with less time spent on unpaid household labor for women, but not for men. Our results highlight the complex nature of unpaid reproductive work under capitalism, emphasizing the importance of considering social class positions when examining inequities in the unpaid work burden.

Suggested Citation

  • David M. Fields & Jacqueline Strenio & Odile Mackett & Iris Buder, 2026. "For Whom Does One Toil? Time Use Differentials, Social Reproduction, and Occupational Prestige," Forum for Social Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(1), pages 83-104, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:fosoec:v:55:y:2026:i:1:p:83-104
    DOI: 10.1080/07360932.2024.2394459
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/07360932.2024.2394459
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/07360932.2024.2394459?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:fosoec:v:55:y:2026:i:1:p:83-104. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RFSE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.