IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/fosoec/v55y2026i1p24-41.html

Social Protection, Informality, and Social Reproduction: A Schematic Analytical Framework for Latin America

Author

Listed:
  • David Cano Ortiz

Abstract

The lack of social protection coverage for informal workers is an enduring problem in Latin American countries, to which governments have responded by expanding different forms of social assistance. This solution has been insufficient, however, and it is also criticized for deepening the fragmentation of social protection systems. In this article, I adopt an alternative view to analyze such matters, based on the Theory of Social Reproduction and a schematic representation of National Systems of Social Protection from the French Regulation school. I adapt the schematic representation to portray a typology of systems of social reproduction with informality, which makes up an analytical framework to understand the interaction between informality and social protection. Based on it, I argue that social protection fragmentation and the pervasiveness of informality are both stabilizing social responses in the context of an increased commodification of social reproduction in Latin America. Therefore, these problems should be better addressed through institutional and structural transformations towards decommodification that push capital to internalize the costs of social reproduction.

Suggested Citation

  • David Cano Ortiz, 2026. "Social Protection, Informality, and Social Reproduction: A Schematic Analytical Framework for Latin America," Forum for Social Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(1), pages 24-41, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:fosoec:v:55:y:2026:i:1:p:24-41
    DOI: 10.1080/07360932.2024.2347880
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/07360932.2024.2347880
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/07360932.2024.2347880?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:fosoec:v:55:y:2026:i:1:p:24-41. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RFSE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.