IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/fosoec/v55y2026i1p141-155.html

Bearded, Mustached, and Hairy, but Looking Pretty. Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, Biopolitics and Normative Femininity

Author

Listed:
  • Claudia V. Zamudio-Lazarín
  • Oscar A. Martínez-Martínez

Abstract

Femininity standards have served as social control, they have been an instrument of biopower designed to maintain the capitalist social, political, and economic system in which female bodies are considered devices that produce capital. Beauty practices, among them hair removal, are a mandate for women’s bodies to turn them into desirable objects to attract and please men. However, women with hirsutism due to Polycystic Ovary Syndrome are naturally unable to comply these duties, as this disorder causes hair growth. Therefore, is necessary to ask: how female identity was transformed by suffering hirsutism due to PCOS? And how does it relate to biopolitics and social reproduction? To answer we analyzed different experiences through multimodal discourse analysis. The results indicate that in the face of violence and exclusion, women had to transform their identity by the adaptation of femininity to an attainable goal. Also, by presenting their non-conformist bodies to the media with an emancipatory message against the imposition of the prevailing canons of beauty.

Suggested Citation

  • Claudia V. Zamudio-Lazarín & Oscar A. Martínez-Martínez, 2026. "Bearded, Mustached, and Hairy, but Looking Pretty. Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, Biopolitics and Normative Femininity," Forum for Social Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(1), pages 141-155, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:fosoec:v:55:y:2026:i:1:p:141-155
    DOI: 10.1080/07360932.2024.2444277
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/07360932.2024.2444277
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/07360932.2024.2444277?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:fosoec:v:55:y:2026:i:1:p:141-155. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RFSE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.