IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/fosoec/v51y2022i4p453-466.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Too Much Redistribution, Too Little or Just Right?

Author

Listed:
  • Jon Reiersen

Abstract

How informed are individuals about the income distribution in their own country? This article presents survey data showing that Norwegians tend to overestimate the level of inequality in Norway. This contrasts with survey data from the United States (US), presented in Norton and Ariely , showing that Americans vastly underestimate inequality in their own country. These findings are interpreted by emphasizing the effect existing differences in income have on peoples’ psychological capacity to observe income differences. Norwegians are also asked how they ideally would like income to be distributed. They construct an ideal income distribution that is surprisingly close to the actual (egalitarian) distribution in Norway. Americans also construct an ideal distribution that more closely resembles the distribution of income in Norway than in the US. Respondents’ preferences for small income differences are discussed with reference to recent findings in experimental and neurobiological research.

Suggested Citation

  • Jon Reiersen, 2022. "Too Much Redistribution, Too Little or Just Right?," Forum for Social Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(4), pages 453-466, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:fosoec:v:51:y:2022:i:4:p:453-466
    DOI: 10.1080/07360932.2021.2011763
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/07360932.2021.2011763
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/07360932.2021.2011763?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:fosoec:v:51:y:2022:i:4:p:453-466. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RFSE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.