IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/flgsxx/v46y2020i6p934-958.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does cultural policy matter? Political orientations, cultural management models, and the results of public cultural action in Barcelona and Valencia

Author

Listed:
  • Joaquim Rius-Ulldemolins
  • Ricardo Klein

Abstract

Since the beginning of the 20th century, analyses of local cultural policies have sought to highlight their instrumentalisation in projects for urban renewal and/or city branding. In general, the spotlight has been put on the waning Cultural Democratisation Model and its flagging commitment to social cohesion and redistribution. This might lead us to see cultural policy and political management as having little bearing on the construction of The Creative City Model (henceforth CCM). However, this would be a mistake, as this paper will show. It compares two cities, Barcelona and Valencia, whose local cultural policies are strongly conditioned by the CCM. The contrasting political orientation of the two cities, the way each applies the CCM, their differing management models, and the different long-term trends in their cultural facilities end up shaping social and cultural outcomes, the sustainability of these results, and their redistributive impact.

Suggested Citation

  • Joaquim Rius-Ulldemolins & Ricardo Klein, 2020. "Does cultural policy matter? Political orientations, cultural management models, and the results of public cultural action in Barcelona and Valencia," Local Government Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(6), pages 934-958, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:flgsxx:v:46:y:2020:i:6:p:934-958
    DOI: 10.1080/03003930.2020.1739023
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03003930.2020.1739023
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03003930.2020.1739023?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:flgsxx:v:46:y:2020:i:6:p:934-958. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/flgs .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.