IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/flgsxx/v46y2020i5p763-779.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The attractiveness of local and national list labels: the role of socio-economic inequalities on the success of electoral lists

Author

Listed:
  • Jeremy Dodeigne
  • Vincent Jacquet
  • Min Reuchamps

Abstract

According to the nationalisation hypothesis, it is sometimes argued that electoral lists competing at local elections under a national party label are more likely to win. Yet, in many countries, local lists are still much present. This article seeks to assess the attractiveness of local and national list labels at local elections. Following Rokkan’s hypothesis of the nationalisation of local politics, we test the role of socio-economic inequality on the success of electoral lists across local polities. Based on an original dataset distinguishing the labels of 1.012 electoral lists – be they local, mixed or national – in the 262 Walloon municipalities in Belgium, the multilevel regression demonstrates that local and mixed labels present a significant electoral advantage vis-à-vis national party labels. However, the article shows that this electoral gain decreases as economic inequalities increase: national labels, especially left-wing parties, attract more voters as inequalities rise.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeremy Dodeigne & Vincent Jacquet & Min Reuchamps, 2020. "The attractiveness of local and national list labels: the role of socio-economic inequalities on the success of electoral lists," Local Government Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(5), pages 763-779, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:flgsxx:v:46:y:2020:i:5:p:763-779
    DOI: 10.1080/03003930.2019.1677625
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03003930.2019.1677625
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03003930.2019.1677625?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:flgsxx:v:46:y:2020:i:5:p:763-779. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/flgs .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.