IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/flgsxx/v43y2017i6p992-1013.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Governing environmental conflicts: A comparative analysis of ten protests against industrial facilities in urban China

Author

Listed:
  • Yanwei Li
  • Joop Koppenjan
  • Vincent Homburg

Abstract

With the increasing numbers of environmental conflicts in recent years, Chinese local governments are deploying a variety of strategies to address them. Using the method of agreement and the method of difference, this article explores the question of why local governments adopt particular strategies during conflicts over the construction or operation of industrial facilities. The findings reveal that the position of higher-level governments, the costs involved in adapting projects and the threats posed by the form of protest to social stability are important conditions in explaining the differences in the patterns of government strategies. The authoritarian responsiveness that characterises Chinese government strategies results in high political, economic and environmental costs. The big challenge for Chinese governments is to develop policies, institutions and capacities to deal with environmental concerns in a more proactive and balanced way.

Suggested Citation

  • Yanwei Li & Joop Koppenjan & Vincent Homburg, 2017. "Governing environmental conflicts: A comparative analysis of ten protests against industrial facilities in urban China," Local Government Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(6), pages 992-1013, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:flgsxx:v:43:y:2017:i:6:p:992-1013
    DOI: 10.1080/03003930.2017.1375409
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03003930.2017.1375409
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03003930.2017.1375409?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:flgsxx:v:43:y:2017:i:6:p:992-1013. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/flgs .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.