IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/femeco/v31y2025i3p136-167.html

Do Gender Stereotypes Affect Girls’ Self-Expectation of Working in Sci-Tech? Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Xian Zheng
  • Xiaoyuan Zou
  • Sidan Hu
  • Changhong Li

Abstract

Promoting high expectations among girls for working in the field of science and technology (sci-tech) is a crucial step toward nurturing female talent in this domain. Using data from the China Education Panel Survey, this study investigates the impact of female students’ gender-math self-stereotypes on their self-expectations of working in sci-tech. The findings indicate that girls, who do not believe boys to be better than girls in math, have significantly higher self-expectations of working in sci-tech. By contrast, this finding does not hold for boys. This correlation is more pronounced in girls who excel in math and are taught by female math teachers. Girls without gender stereotypes are likely to exhibit better math performance and thus have higher self-expectations of working in sci-tech. This study contributes to the growing understanding of the influence of gender stereotypes and offers insights into how to cultivate female talent in the sci-tech field.HIGHLIGHTS Girls without gender stereotypes have higher self-expectations in sci-tech careers.The effect is stronger among girls excelling in math and taught by women teachers.Gender stereotypes affect girls’ math performance, influencing career expectations.Addressing gender stereotypes can help nurture female talents in sci-tech fields.Study uses China Education Panel Survey data to provide robust empirical evidence.

Suggested Citation

  • Xian Zheng & Xiaoyuan Zou & Sidan Hu & Changhong Li, 2025. "Do Gender Stereotypes Affect Girls’ Self-Expectation of Working in Sci-Tech? Evidence from China," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(3), pages 136-167, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:femeco:v:31:y:2025:i:3:p:136-167
    DOI: 10.1080/13545701.2025.2549415
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13545701.2025.2549415
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13545701.2025.2549415?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:femeco:v:31:y:2025:i:3:p:136-167. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RFEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.