IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/femeco/v31y2025i2p57-89.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Long Work Hours and Long Commutes in the Greater Accra Region of Ghana: Time Poverty and Gender

Author

Listed:
  • Fiona Carmichael
  • Patricia Daley
  • Christian Darko
  • Jo Duberley
  • Marco Ercolani
  • Tim Schwanen
  • Daniel Wheatley

Abstract

Previous research suggests that women in Sub-Saharan African and other low- and middle-income countries are more time-poor than men. There is also contrary evidence that highlights differences in women's employment rates and access to basic infrastructure. This study examines gender differences in the length of the working day and time poverty in Ghana's Greater Accra Region. The analysis uses a unique primary dataset that includes time spent commuting to and from work and time in paid and unpaid work. Time spent commuting is salient in the Greater Accra Region; commute times can be long and public transport, mainly by trotro, is often uncomfortable. The analysis shows that, when time commuting and in household work are included, women's working days are longer and they are more time-poor than men. Women's greater reliance on trotros for commuting and higher rates of small scale self-employment also contribute to their longer working days.HIGHLIGHTSTime poverty limits time for leisure, sleep, and personal care, impacting life quality.In the Greater Accra Region, working days are long, averaging over twelve hours and commuting times add on average two hours to the working day.Women’s working days are 0.8 h longer, and they are more likely to be time poor.Women's time poverty reflects longer hours in unpaid household work.Self-employed women with no employees are among the most time poor.

Suggested Citation

  • Fiona Carmichael & Patricia Daley & Christian Darko & Jo Duberley & Marco Ercolani & Tim Schwanen & Daniel Wheatley, 2025. "Long Work Hours and Long Commutes in the Greater Accra Region of Ghana: Time Poverty and Gender," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(2), pages 57-89, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:femeco:v:31:y:2025:i:2:p:57-89
    DOI: 10.1080/13545701.2024.2413913
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13545701.2024.2413913
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13545701.2024.2413913?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:femeco:v:31:y:2025:i:2:p:57-89. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RFEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.