IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/femeco/v31y2025i2p186-223.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Intrahousehold Decision Making and Fertility Choices in Rural Senegal and Uganda

Author

Listed:
  • Kaat Van Hoyweghen
  • Goedele Van den Broeck
  • Miet Maertens

Abstract

Feminist economic approaches have transformed mainstream economic analysis to better account for intrahousehold decision making. To quantify decision making, studies resort to self-reported survey-based measures, derived from questions directed to household members, or proxy-variable methods. This study uses a choice experiment, a stated preference method, implemented in rural Senegal and Uganda and specifically distinguishes between individual and household choices to analyze spouses’ preferences on fertility and child raising and calculate a decision-making coefficient. Findings show individual fertility preferences of men and women cannot substitute for household-level choices, and intrahousehold decision making concerning fertility and child raising is region specific. While in Uganda household fertility choices reflect a balance between the spouses’ fertility preferences, in Senegal these choices seem more dominated by the husband’s preference. This study demonstrates the importance of considering the adequate decision-making unit when designing family planning and child-centered programs and of using a region-specific approach.HIGHLIGHTSAnalyzing spousal fertility and child-raising choices provides an alternative to traditional proxies for intrahousehold decision making.Choice experimental data and methods enables the calculation of a decision-making coefficient.Individual fertility preferences cannot substitute for household-level choices.Considering the adequate gender and decision-making unit is crucial in designing family planning programs.

Suggested Citation

  • Kaat Van Hoyweghen & Goedele Van den Broeck & Miet Maertens, 2025. "Intrahousehold Decision Making and Fertility Choices in Rural Senegal and Uganda," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(2), pages 186-223, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:femeco:v:31:y:2025:i:2:p:186-223
    DOI: 10.1080/13545701.2024.2413370
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13545701.2024.2413370
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13545701.2024.2413370?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:femeco:v:31:y:2025:i:2:p:186-223. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RFEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.