IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/femeco/v29y2023i2p1-31.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Race/Ethnicity and Sex Differences in Attitudes Toward Policies for Gender Equality in the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Nabamallika Dehingia
  • Jeni Klugman
  • Elena Ortiz
  • Anita Raj

Abstract

This study examines whether intersecting identities of race/ethnicity and sex are associated with attitudes toward gender equality policies, using online survey data from a representative sample in the United States carried out in August 2020. Participants (N = 2,443) were categorized as White Male, Black Male, Hispanic Male, White Female, Black Female, and Hispanic Female. Findings reveal that women across racial/ethnic groups and minority men, as compared to White men, have more egalitarian views on the importance of gender equality in policy and politics. While there is general support for women in political leadership, the race/ethnicity by sex differences in attitudes related to gender equality in employment are larger. These findings update and extend prior research on sex differences in gender equality attitudes, including highlighting the presence of a sex and race/ethnicity interaction.HIGHLIGHTS Attitudes are drivers of change when it comes to gender equality.In the US, there is majority support for gender equality, albeit with key gaps by race/ethnicity and sex.Women are more likely than men to hold egalitarian views.Men are more attached to traditional family roles for women, regardless of race.All men tend to relatively gain from patriarchal norms around paid and unpaid work.

Suggested Citation

  • Nabamallika Dehingia & Jeni Klugman & Elena Ortiz & Anita Raj, 2023. "Race/Ethnicity and Sex Differences in Attitudes Toward Policies for Gender Equality in the United States," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(2), pages 1-31, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:femeco:v:29:y:2023:i:2:p:1-31
    DOI: 10.1080/13545701.2022.2128199
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13545701.2022.2128199
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13545701.2022.2128199?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:femeco:v:29:y:2023:i:2:p:1-31. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RFEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.