IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/femeco/v28y2022i4p89-111.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Gendered Outbreak of COVID-19 in South Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Jinwoo Lee

Abstract

Although South Korea is well-known for its aggressive response to COVID-19, little is known about how the risk of infection manifests differently by gender. Using real-time data on confirmed cases, this study empirically examines the gendered outbreak of COVID-19 driven by occupational segregation in South Korea. It investigates gender differences in risk of work-related exposure, particularly for those jobs where essential activities are conducted, such as in the healthcare sector, and that are dominated by women. The results from the multinomial logit model confirm that women have a higher risk of workplace exposure than men, particularly in pink-collar and care jobs. The findings emphasize the need for a gender-aware perspective to policy measures advanced during the pandemic and recovery.HIGHLIGHTS Gender is an important factor for determining infection risks of COVID-19 in workplaces.In South Korea’s gender-segregated labor markets, women have higher exposure to infection than men.Women typically occupy jobs in the healthcare and welfare sectors that require frequent interpersonal interaction.They are also underrepresented in occupations with the ability to telecommute.Policy measures must include gender-aware responses and address inequality during the pandemic and recovery.

Suggested Citation

  • Jinwoo Lee, 2022. "The Gendered Outbreak of COVID-19 in South Korea," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(4), pages 89-111, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:femeco:v:28:y:2022:i:4:p:89-111
    DOI: 10.1080/13545701.2022.2057565
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13545701.2022.2057565
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13545701.2022.2057565?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:femeco:v:28:y:2022:i:4:p:89-111. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RFEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.