IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/femeco/v27y2021i3p77-101.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Underground Employment: Analyzing the Job Quality of New York City Subway Dancers

Author

Listed:
  • Leanne Roncolato
  • Cairynne Koh

Abstract

This paper analyzes the New York City subway phenomenon known as “showtime.” Using an individuals-in-relation framework and drawing on Marxist and feminist economic perspectives, it investigates the job quality of subway dancing as a type of informal self-employment. The data come from thirty-four in-depth interviews conducted in 2016. The paper contextualizes earnings, hours, and conditions of work by considering the social relations and power dynamics in which they are embedded. While dancers articulate advantages of this work, such as setting one’s own schedule and having a creative outlet, they also articulate disadvantages, most notably the risk of being arrested. While the dancers see performing on the subway as productively contributing to New York City, the police categorize this activity as a crime. Through this analysis, the paper provides insights into the broader context of work relations and inequality in New York City.HIGHLIGHTS Empowering aspects of subway dancing include not having a boss and ability to express creativity.Challenges include negative passengers and risk of injury or arrest.Subway dancing highlights lack of quality formal employment for marginalized populations in New York City.Criminalizing subway dancing is an example of criminalization of black male bodies in the US.

Suggested Citation

  • Leanne Roncolato & Cairynne Koh, 2021. "Underground Employment: Analyzing the Job Quality of New York City Subway Dancers," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(3), pages 77-101, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:femeco:v:27:y:2021:i:3:p:77-101
    DOI: 10.1080/13545701.2020.1820065
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13545701.2020.1820065
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13545701.2020.1820065?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:femeco:v:27:y:2021:i:3:p:77-101. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RFEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.