IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/femeco/v1y1995i3p40-59.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Race, class, and occupational mobility: black and white women in service work in the united states

Author

Listed:
  • Marilyn Power
  • Sam Rosenberg

Abstract

This paper examines and compares the occupational mobility of black and white women who worked in service occupations in the United States in their late teens and 20s. Rather than using a conventional methodology of hypothesis-testing based on a narrow set of variables, the study uses a descriptive methodology to help illuminate the complex interaction of race, gender, and class in the lives of women. Our goal is to investigate how being a service worker when young contributed to a different “life story” for women of different race and class. The study finds that black women experienced considerably less occupational mobility than white women, and were far more likely to get stuck in low-paid service occupations over the long term. Many of the white women, but few of the black, were able to use service work as a temporary means of support while they prepared themselves for more lucrative employment. Striking differences in class background and presence of children appeared to be contributing factors in this difference in mobility by race.

Suggested Citation

  • Marilyn Power & Sam Rosenberg, 1995. "Race, class, and occupational mobility: black and white women in service work in the united states," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(3), pages 40-59.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:femeco:v:1:y:1995:i:3:p:40-59
    DOI: 10.1080/714042248
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/714042248
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/714042248?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:femeco:v:1:y:1995:i:3:p:40-59. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RFEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.