IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/eurpls/v34y2026i4p761-784.html

Comparing European urban systems using dissimilarity indices

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas Terfrüchte
  • Anna Growe

Abstract

The organization, control and development of urban systems in Europe have long been subjects of debate within the field of spatial sciences. Two major research areas focus on (a) polycentricity and (b) functional differentiation, or the division of labor between cities. However, most studies only address one of these perspectives, either by considering a single country as a case study or by examining only part of an urban system. This is sometimes due to the research focus and sometimes due to a lack of data for Europe-wide analyzes. Above all, this is due to the challenges posed by the different urban systems of nation states. The present study addresses this issue by developing a comparative methodology for analyzing urban systems based on the aforementioned two dimensions. The basic approach involves observing and categorizing differences within a city system using dissimilarity indices. Location data on metropolitan functions form the basis of the empirical analysis. The results offer new insights into urban systems theory and provide a practical foundation for spatial development policy, particularly in the context of European cohesion strategies and resilient settlement structures.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas Terfrüchte & Anna Growe, 2026. "Comparing European urban systems using dissimilarity indices," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(4), pages 761-784, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:eurpls:v:34:y:2026:i:4:p:761-784
    DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2025.2601713
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09654313.2025.2601713
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09654313.2025.2601713?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:eurpls:v:34:y:2026:i:4:p:761-784. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CEPS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.