IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/eurpls/v32y2024i4p720-738.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Overcoming the limitations to co-production in shrinking cities: insights from Latvia, France, and the Netherlands

Author

Listed:
  • Anastasiya Matyushkina
  • Solène Le Borgne
  • Agnes Matoga

Abstract

Co-production often appears as a virtue in academic research and planning practice, particularly in shrinking cities, which struggle to develop effective policies and provide sufficient level of public services. In this paper, we argue that the urban shrinkage context imposes significant limitations to co-production practices, that we urge should not be neglected. Drawing on three contrasting projects in Riga (Latvia), Nevers (France), and Heerlen (the Netherlands), we explore existing limitations and consider possibilities to overcome them. The analyses show that the efficacy of co-production practices is impaired due to a reduced level of trust towards public authorities; selective outmigration; weakened social capital; and political prioritizing of private sector interests over civil society. To overcome these, we discuss the role of several tools, namely mediating actors, independent funding, civic empowerment, and the willingness of public authorities to regenerate power relations.

Suggested Citation

  • Anastasiya Matyushkina & Solène Le Borgne & Agnes Matoga, 2024. "Overcoming the limitations to co-production in shrinking cities: insights from Latvia, France, and the Netherlands," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(4), pages 720-738, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:eurpls:v:32:y:2024:i:4:p:720-738
    DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2023.2207600
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09654313.2023.2207600
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09654313.2023.2207600?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:eurpls:v:32:y:2024:i:4:p:720-738. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CEPS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.