IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/eurpls/v30y2022i4p590-607.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of ‘Covidfencing’ on cross-border commuting: a case of Czech-German borderland

Author

Listed:
  • Lukáš Novotný

Abstract

Cross-border commuters were faced with several problems during the Covid-19 pandemic. Borders were closed, strict checks were introduced thereon and their commuting and often working realities changed. This study focuses on how closed borders and border restrictions affected cross-border workers and their day-to-day work during the Covid-19 pandemic, how their trust in governments and regional municipalities in Czechia and Germany has changed as a result of covidfencing, and how measures during the Covid-19 pandemic changed commuters’ attitudes towards the EU, freedoms and the European single market. Theoretically, the study is rooted in the concept of cross-border integration and the research itself was conducted this spring in the form of semi-structured interviews among cross-border commuters. Research shows a criticism expressed by cross-border commuters towards the attitude of the Czech government and regional municipalities. The commuters argue that they merely use open borders and the opportunity to work within the EU, but that the Czech government and regions have disproportionately prevented them from doing so while turning public sentiment against them. According to them, it is disappointing that Czechia in particular has ignored the fact that they have valid employment contracts within the EU and are obliged to abide by them.

Suggested Citation

  • Lukáš Novotný, 2022. "Effects of ‘Covidfencing’ on cross-border commuting: a case of Czech-German borderland," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(4), pages 590-607, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:eurpls:v:30:y:2022:i:4:p:590-607
    DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2021.1986470
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09654313.2021.1986470
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09654313.2021.1986470?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:eurpls:v:30:y:2022:i:4:p:590-607. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CEPS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.